After the most popular concepts — the most prevalent patterns — that folksonomic analysis are revealed, there will be a backwash.

If you tag your articles “ATOM” or “syndication” or “RSS 1″ and most people tag/label them “RSS” or “feeds” then your conversational influence will tend to be less relevant on the global online conversation. The realization of this might influence the blogger, tagger, writer, etc, to adopt a common speak — a collaborative, grassroots agreed language — in order to be most effective.

And yes, whether we want to admit it or not, A-List bloggers, Mainstream Media, the Academy, and the popular media do, in fact, make the language. Define the language. Help us choose common ground and common tongue.

From the distance at which these patterns can be analyzed, parsed, and recognized, all of this will seem organized and led.

Folksonomy is an emergent system of organization. The patterns, trends, and arc are not designed, they emerge.

I am not naive. Folksonomic patters can be, and often are, influenced. While they may be influencable, they are not centrally controlled or controllable.

Do you think this folksonomic language will evolve from the collective conversations of myriad users, or will a few “prime movers” establish the vocabulary? Either way, seems like it will ultimately seep in to our everyday dialogue. One day perhaps we’ll all speak in tags.

jf