<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Defense of Edelman over Bribery Charges</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chrisabraham.com/2006/12/28/in-defense-of-edelman-over-bribery-charges/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chrisabraham.com/2006/12/28/in-defense-of-edelman-over-bribery-charges/</link>
	<description>Because the Medium is the Message</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:57:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Abraham</title>
		<link>http://chrisabraham.com/2006/12/28/in-defense-of-edelman-over-bribery-charges/comment-page-1/#comment-2264</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Abraham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 16:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisabraham.com/?p=3492#comment-2264</guid>
		<description>Jim, I can&#039;t argue with that logic. You are exactly right. So, I will simple agree with you.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, I can&#8217;t argue with that logic. You are exactly right. So, I will simple agree with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Lane</title>
		<link>http://chrisabraham.com/2006/12/28/in-defense-of-edelman-over-bribery-charges/comment-page-1/#comment-2263</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 13:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisabraham.com/?p=3492#comment-2263</guid>
		<description>
Nice coverage, but what you BELIEVE and what reality IS may be different things. It seems there are a lot of assumptions being made as you were not part of this particular effort although your background, brief as it was, does give you ground to express your opinion. That you have done. Were it just this isolated incident with Edelman, I would be inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt, but their recent record of ethically-challenged gaffs holds greater sway that does your brief exposure.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice coverage, but what you BELIEVE and what reality IS may be different things. It seems there are a lot of assumptions being made as you were not part of this particular effort although your background, brief as it was, does give you ground to express your opinion. That you have done. Were it just this isolated incident with Edelman, I would be inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt, but their recent record of ethically-challenged gaffs holds greater sway that does your brief exposure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
