Lingerie Models Should be Voluptuous and Sumptuous and Curvy

by Chris Abraham on 05/12/2006

PinExt Lingerie Models Should be Voluptuous and Sumptuous and Curvy

victorias secret lingerie u Lingerie Models Should be Voluptuous and Sumptuous and Curvy
Since when did lingerie models lose their curviness, their shapeliness, and their womanliness? When did the fashion models steal all of the lingerie models’ jobs? I wouldn’t suggest feeding haute couture, but what about haute allure? Feed them haute cuisine, if you must!
victorias secret lingerie u Lingerie Models Should be Voluptuous and Sumptuous and Curvy
I thought lingerie models looked at least like this:
lingerie models Lingerie Models Should be Voluptuous and Sumptuous and Curvy
Or this, right?
lingerie Lingerie Models Should be Voluptuous and Sumptuous and Curvy


PinExt Lingerie Models Should be Voluptuous and Sumptuous and Curvy
Be Sociable, Share!
  • more Lingerie Models Should be Voluptuous and Sumptuous and Curvy

Share on Tumblr

{ 14 comments… read them below or add one }

Anthony Citrano December 5, 2006 at 23:08

They didn’t lose it. Adriana, Gisele and Karolina are curvy. At least they didn’t use Jacquetta Wheeler this year (I don’t think.) I mean, I *love* Jacquetta – but that girl is NOT a lingerie model.

I agree with you. You need some curves for this kinda work. Especially if you want to convince all those size 10 housewives that they’ll look sexy in this shit.

Reply

dina December 5, 2006 at 23:21

:) One must bless blogging for its many attributes…this is blogging perfection : a tease of an idea, so to speak…

Reply

rachel December 6, 2006 at 10:06

there is curvy and then there is curvy. Heidi Klum has curves but they are stretched out over a six foot long frame.

If they were selling this stuff to men, then I think you would be right, but they aren’t. They are selling it to women who don’t have near the appreciation for the curves.

Reply

Chris Abraham December 6, 2006 at 10:42

Rachel, last night was all about getting men to buy more lingerie for their ladies. It is Christmas season and they weren’t pimping cotton undies and job bras.

Reply

Sporty Spice December 6, 2006 at 11:14

Yes, men may have THOUGHT they were purchasing lingerie for their ladies. The reality is, any man who gives his lady a gift of lingerie is fooling no one. Its a gift purely for himself. And I agree with Rachel up there. Those models was totally fit, absolutely curvy enough and in my humble opinion, super gorgeous. The photo stills of the show present women who take care of themselves, aren’t gaunt, healthy looking and perfectly proportioned. Sorry boys.

Reply

Sporty Spice December 6, 2006 at 11:39

“those models were” – heh heh

Reply

Chris Abraham December 6, 2006 at 13:35

This girls weren’t fit, they were famished, gawky, skinny, and board-flat. Those wonderbras can make Gandhi look buxom.

Also, ahem, “any man who gives his lady a gift of lingerie is fooling no one. Its a gift purely for himself.”

Duh. And lookin’ even better on the floor — huzzah!

Reply

Chris Abraham December 6, 2006 at 13:38

And the latest Bond girl was all bones, ribs, spine, elbows, knees, and ankles. That’s no sort of Bond girl! Egad, feed the Bond girl!

Reply

Chris Abraham December 6, 2006 at 13:45

Scroll up. These girls are built like supermodels — runway models. I want my lingerie and swimsuit models to be Brazilian.

Reply

Anthony Citrano December 7, 2006 at 16:14

I know you’re not baiting me, but I am nibbling nonetheless. There are thighs and hips and breasts and asses there. I see them.

Reply

Chris Abraham December 7, 2006 at 17:03

Technically speaking, victims of famines have thighs, hips, breasts, and asses, too. Technically speaking, that is.

Reply

Victoria June 3, 2007 at 04:56

Nice work keep it up these girls are really hot

Reply

jd August 26, 2008 at 17:51

the victoria’s secret models are curvier than the flat chested boy looking models on runways. don’t put slender women down because your want someone with a huge ass and boobs. the only reason you don’t like the vs ones is because you want to sexually objectify women and want to see nothing but a pair of ass, thighs, and hips….that’s not lingerie that is typical of a men’s magazine. Women want to look at things they can wear…they don’t want to be distracted by some other girls huge ass….that’s something only a guy would say. and the girl you have in the middle her name is vida guerra….she has fake breast implants….i thought “real” women were supposed to have boos like the vs models. the vs models are more toned and fit and dont’ look anorexic. the girl int he middle is fake and has a huge disproportioned body which most women don’t have. don’t put the rest of us down becuz you have some sick fettish for a huge ass. not everyone does and like a proportioned one.

Reply

MikeWilson November 12, 2008 at 05:18

jd: you’re a moron.

Having a particular flavor that hits you just right doesn’t make you an evil misogynist.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: