<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Public Affairs Blogging Comes with Different Rules than PR Blogging</title> <atom:link href="http://chrisabraham.com/2006/11/05/public-affairs-blogging-comes-with-different-rules-than-pr-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://chrisabraham.com/2006/11/05/public-affairs-blogging-comes-with-different-rules-than-pr-blogging/</link> <description>Because the Medium is the Message</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 09:02:24 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Chris Abraham</title><link>http://chrisabraham.com/2006/11/05/public-affairs-blogging-comes-with-different-rules-than-pr-blogging/#comment-2075</link> <dc:creator>Chris Abraham</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 08:06:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chrisabraham.com/?p=3216#comment-2075</guid> <description>Yeah, thank god for FISKING. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, thank god for FISKING.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan Trenn</title><link>http://chrisabraham.com/2006/11/05/public-affairs-blogging-comes-with-different-rules-than-pr-blogging/#comment-2074</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan Trenn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 14:49:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chrisabraham.com/?p=3216#comment-2074</guid> <description>ChrisThanks for you comments regarding my blog entry.  I got frustrated with the idea that many of the same evangelistic bloggers that had been espousing transparency seemed to be so willing to give EdelmanPR the automatic benefit of the doubt.  My guess is that it was because &#039;Richard&#039; - the CEO of a major PR firm was able to massage their concerns.What is it seems that most miss is that 1)the mistake wasn&#039;t the actual blogs, it was getting caught, and 2) this is what we&#039;re going to see more of in the public/political affairs arenas.Jonathan </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris</p><p>Thanks for you comments regarding my blog entry.  I got frustrated with the idea that many of the same evangelistic bloggers that had been espousing transparency seemed to be so willing to give EdelmanPR the automatic benefit of the doubt.  My guess is that it was because &#8216;Richard&#8217; &#8211; the CEO of a major PR firm was able to massage their concerns.</p><p>What is it seems that most miss is that 1)the mistake wasn&#8217;t the actual blogs, it was getting caught, and 2) this is what we&#8217;re going to see more of in the public/political affairs arenas.</p><p>Jonathan</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 4/7 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 542/542 objects using disk: basic

Served from: chrisabraham.com @ 2012-05-25 15:09:35 -->
