<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Public Affairs Blogging Comes with Different Rules than PR Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chrisabraham.com/2006/11/05/public-affairs-blogging-comes-with-different-rules-than-pr-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chrisabraham.com/2006/11/05/public-affairs-blogging-comes-with-different-rules-than-pr-blogging/</link>
	<description>Because the Medium is the Message</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:05:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Abraham</title>
		<link>http://chrisabraham.com/2006/11/05/public-affairs-blogging-comes-with-different-rules-than-pr-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-2075</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Abraham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 08:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisabraham.com/?p=3216#comment-2075</guid>
		<description>Yeah, thank god for FISKING.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, thank god for FISKING.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Trenn</title>
		<link>http://chrisabraham.com/2006/11/05/public-affairs-blogging-comes-with-different-rules-than-pr-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-2074</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Trenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 14:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisabraham.com/?p=3216#comment-2074</guid>
		<description>Chris

Thanks for you comments regarding my blog entry.  I got frustrated with the idea that many of the same evangelistic bloggers that had been espousing transparency seemed to be so willing to give EdelmanPR the automatic benefit of the doubt.  My guess is that it was because &#039;Richard&#039; - the CEO of a major PR firm was able to massage their concerns.

What is it seems that most miss is that 1)the mistake wasn&#039;t the actual blogs, it was getting caught, and 2) this is what we&#039;re going to see more of in the public/political affairs arenas.

Jonathan
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris</p>
<p>Thanks for you comments regarding my blog entry.  I got frustrated with the idea that many of the same evangelistic bloggers that had been espousing transparency seemed to be so willing to give EdelmanPR the automatic benefit of the doubt.  My guess is that it was because &#8216;Richard&#8217; &#8211; the CEO of a major PR firm was able to massage their concerns.</p>
<p>What is it seems that most miss is that 1)the mistake wasn&#8217;t the actual blogs, it was getting caught, and 2) this is what we&#8217;re going to see more of in the public/political affairs arenas.</p>
<p>Jonathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
