“Democratic Representatives Ed Markey of Massachusetts, Jay Inslee of Washington state, Anna Eshoo of California and Rick Boucher of Virginia in the House and Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon in the Senate,” I wonder if you have ever considered the fact that legislation always makes things more expensive. Net Neutrality is 1984 doublespeak!
Oh, and laws make lawyers rich, which always costs someone lots of money.
Since the founding documents from our founding fathers, there are very few legislations that make anything but more complex, more regulated, and more expensive.
Even if you are using the GNU Free Software definition of free, “a matter of liberty, not price . . .’free’ as in ‘free speech,’ not as in ‘free beer’”to define all the freedoms we will get from all the government oversight and legislation that Net Neutrality will offer, I daresay that liberty means the following: “autonomy: immunity from arbitrary exercise of authority: political independence,” “personal freedom from servitude or confinement or oppression,” “liberty, or freedom, is a condition in which an individual has immunity from the arbitrary exercise of authority,” and “political independence; freedom of choice.” All of these definitions of liberty suggest freedom from Net Neutrality legislation, Internet regulation, and undue oversight and enforcement of the World Wide Web.
Come on, it’s only logical! At least give me that much!
Via Slashdot
