Facebook comments:

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Dave Davies 26/04/2006 at 14:47

This post makes many good points however I have to disagree on two major issues:

The First:

Chris wrote:
To illustrate the first two points, I will take a bit of copy and optimize it for search engines and their love for keyword density. Instead of this:

“Viral marketing is now an essential strategy for every firm. It has become as essential to small and large firms alike, both for its relative affordability and its potentially high effectivity. With the advent of the Internet, it has become amazingly efficient: all you need is a laptop and a compelling message.???

Try this:

“Viral marketing is now an essential marketing strategy for every marketing firm. Viral marketing, also known as relationship marketing, buzz marketing, word-of-mouth marketing, conversational marketing, and passion marketing, has become as essential to small and large marketing firms alike, both for its relative affordability and its potentially high effectivity. With the advent of the Internet, viral marketing has become amazingly efficient: all you need is a laptop and a compelling message.???

I have to objections to this point for three reasons:

  1. There is nothing more important that a human visitor. After going through the massive energy it takes to get high rankings why would you want to lose them the second they get to your site? Search engines definitely need to be taken into account however one cannot optimize solely for them.
  2. Assuming that the phrase “viral marketing” is the phrase this text is being optimized for and that the rest of the text on the page is equally “tweaked” proving the same density throughout you would end up with the following densities on the page: “viral marketing” – 4.12% | “viral” – 4.11% | “marketing” – 15.07%. This is WAY too high. The highest density in the current top ten on Google is: “viral marketing” – 3.05% | “viral” – 3.81% | “marketing” – 6.48%. Using the content noted as poor the densities are: “viral marketing” – 1.93% | “viral” – 1.92% | “marketing” – 1.92%. Ironically this actually falls into the upper end of the densities on the current top ten and, while it could be slightly higher, is actually a good density and more importantly – IT READ WELL!
  3. The keyword density of a single page is NOT the end-all-be-all of SEO. There are over 100 factors Google uses to rank your site. Even if the poorly worded, higher density version was better for SEO it is poor for the visitor. One should write properly (though with the search engines in mind) and focus the rest of their energies on the multitude of other factors such as link building (which will be easier if you have a decently worded site I might add).

The Second:

Chris wrote:
One respectable way of increasing your link popularity and prestige in Google is to use a service like Text Link Ads. What Text Link Adss offers is a link-buying service that does double-duty. The double duty is as follows: in addition to creating clickable links on the popular sites that can choose and afford, it will also allow you to legally create Google bombs that will heighten the probability that your company website or your corporate blog will turn up when people search for your company, your industry, your market, your products, and your services.

While paid links from a service such as Text Link Ads can definitely help your SEO one cannot use the term “legally”. Google has come out in direct opposition to the use of paid links to help site rankings and PageRank increases. Further, many of the paid link services place your link in the footer or other less visible area of their pages. They are generally not meant to send raffic, just PageRank.

Now, I’m not saying that paid links should never be considered or that they’re not useful in some cases HOWEVER one must understand that Google doesn’t like them, is making every effort to reduce and/or eliminate the weight they pass on to sites (effectively I should add) and you may well end up paying significant amount of your advertising budget to purchased links that in fact don’t pass on any SEO value (and worst of all, it’s extremely difficult to tell which ones are and which aren’t helping your cause.

But this is just one SEO’s opinion. :)

Reply

2 Teketen 27/04/2006 at 03:15

Very interesting! Specially the part about CSS and style

Reply

3 Chris Abraham 27/04/2006 at 13:02

Dave Davies is who I would use if I needed to hire an SEO expert. He is one of the few people who doesn’t sell snake oil.

Reply

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution.

Previous post:

Next post: